Thread 4: Personal Thoughts about LK-99 (in Chronological Order)

 

Thread 4:

Personal Thoughts on LK-99

Part 1/#

P.S: My thoughts are an uninformed opinion (aka dumb), I just wanna put them out there to help the others brainstorm good ideas.

Text version: https://aourirabderrahim.blogspot.com/

#LK99

 

①

Metals who are:

-Pure have 1 state, 1 prediction, 1rslt=>boring.

-Impure have many possible states/predictions/rslts=>not boring=>focus on them; might help w/ LK-99; E.g. materials of:

~ Pre-1970s industry had a lot of lead and asbestos.

~ Pre-1945 had Low Background radiation

 

②

Can Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) help with knowing what the original Korean sample is composed of??

How about Nanoscale Secondary Ion Mass Spectromete (NanoSIMS) imaging?

Any ideas about the most promising imaging technique out there to figure this thing?

 

③

I don’t know if polarity factors into Superconductivity; but if it does, then doing levitation tests on hollow magnets may not be a good idea, because the latter can have weird properties on magnetic polarity around them:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpvGmGEevFo

 

④

Smashed the rock into small granules? Spread them at once on a large fat flat holeless magnet (w/ bordered edges) to know all the levitating the parts.

Or grinding it first so you can sift through shambles on top of magnet and collect all the levitating –dust- particles??? hhh

⑤

People say that if LK-99 is the real deal, its mass & reliable production will take years/decades to accomplish.

The thing is that this is usually true when we have a product that’s made of rare raw materials or made of materials that are hard to produce.

But in this case, LK-99 is made of cheap raw materials, which will make the process of trial & error very fast, and very cost effective.

My projection for mass production is 6 months at best, 5 years at worse.